Global Insights: The Case Against Prioritizing BMD Cooperation with Russia
By
Richard Weitz
|
06 Jul 2010
Almost everyone would welcome greater cooperation between Moscow and Washington on ballistic missile defense. But decades of frustrating experience have taught us that this is precisely the wrong issue to make the centerpiece of the U.S.-Russia reset, notwithstanding what
Andrew Futter argues
in his WPR Briefing from last week. Rather than waste additional time and goodwill on the endeavor, we need to think more creatively about deepening bilateral collaboration regarding other issues, including promoting regional security in Afghanistan and Central Asia.
Nevertheless, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statements during her visit to Poland last weekend show that the Obama administration largely supports Futter's approach, at least at the rhetorical level. On July 3,
Clinton joined Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski
in Krakow to witness the signing of a protocol amending the Ballistic Missile Defense Agreement signed by the two countries in 2008. Rather than deploying the 10 newly designed long-range ground-based interceptors in Poland that were initially planned by the Bush administration, the Obama administration's European-based Phased Adaptive Approach relies more on already existing SM-3 interceptors. ...