About Get Newsletters Login
February 05, 2012
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

Global Insights: The Case Against Prioritizing BMD Cooperation with Russia

By Richard Weitz | 06 Jul 2010
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish
Almost everyone would welcome greater cooperation between Moscow and Washington on ballistic missile defense. But decades of frustrating experience have taught us that this is precisely the wrong issue to make the centerpiece of the U.S.-Russia reset, notwithstanding what Andrew Futter argues in his WPR Briefing from last week. Rather than waste additional time and goodwill on the endeavor, we need to think more creatively about deepening bilateral collaboration regarding other issues, including promoting regional security in Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Nevertheless, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statements during her visit to Poland last weekend show that the Obama administration largely supports Futter's approach, at least at the rhetorical level. On July 3, Clinton joined Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski in Krakow to witness the signing of a protocol amending the Ballistic Missile Defense Agreement signed by the two countries in 2008. Rather than deploying the 10 newly designed long-range ground-based interceptors in Poland that were initially planned by the Bush administration, the Obama administration's European-based Phased Adaptive Approach relies more on already existing SM-3 interceptors. ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

Already a subscriber? Login here.

Read an overview of all that is included in our subscription service.

We also offer site-wide subscriptions for organizations of all types. Get more information about our institutional service.

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish