About Get Newsletters Login
February 05, 2012
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

Eurasian Security Institutions: The CSTO and SCO

By Richard Weitz | 29 Jun 2010
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish
Perhaps the most surprising feature of the protracted crisis in Kyrgyzstan is what has not happened: Neither of Eurasia's two preeminent regional security institutions, the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), have coordinated a military intervention in that country.

The mass protests, deaths, and refugee crisis involving perhaps 1 million people has represented one of the most acute challenges to Eurasian stability in the history of either organization, both of which were founded almost a decade ago. In mid-June 2010, the Kyrgyz interim authorities even directly appealed for Russian military intervention on their behalf, but Moscow declined to act military -- either unilaterally or within the framework of either the CSTO or the SCO. Both organizations have offered primarily verbal support and limited humanitarian assistance to their beleaguered member state. Despite expectations, neither organization has yet become a modern version of the Warsaw Pact, using military and police power to keep its client regimes in power. ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

Already a subscriber? Login here.

Read an overview of all that is included in our subscription service.

We also offer site-wide subscriptions for organizations of all types. Get more information about our institutional service.

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish