About Get Newsletters Login
February 08, 2012
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

The New Rules: Nuclear Posture Review Fixes What Ain't Broke

By Thomas P.M. Barnett | 12 Apr 2010
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish
For those wondering how President Barack Obama planned to justify his Nobel Peace Prize, two developments last week strongly suggest that it will be by way of his dream of a "world without nuclear weapons." The first was his successful conclusion of a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with Russia, which takes almost a third off the top of both sides' massive nuclear arsenals. The second was Obama's new Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), which declared that "preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism" was the nation's No. 1 strategic priority. At the same time, the review offers a striking new pledge not to use nuclear weapons to retaliate against states in compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) -- even if they attack America with chemical or biological weapons.

It's hard to argue against reducing the number of nuclear weapons. But Obama's new posture document goes even further than that, proposing a substantial reduction in the role of nuclear weapons in America's national security. The difference might seem esoteric, but it's not. ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

Already a subscriber? Login here.

Read an overview of all that is included in our subscription service.

We also offer site-wide subscriptions for organizations of all types. Get more information about our institutional service.

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish