About Get Newsletters Login
February 08, 2012
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

Internet Content Regulation and the Limits of Sovereignty

By Milton Mueller | 01 Sep 2009
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish
The Internet made a major contribution to global society by disrupting the regulation of media content by nation-states. It took the libertarian principle of "absence of prior restraint" and globalized it: No one had to ask for permission, or be licensed, to make their ideas and publications globally accessible. This open access, sometimes praised as "network neutrality" or the "end to end principle," took states by surprise. The explosion of ideas, services and expression associated with the Internet's growth in the mid-1990s happened because states weren't prepared for it and because states weren't in charge.

Yet even if we accept the value of this regulatory breakdown, certain kinds of expression are still considered taboo, and public authorities want to censor them. The flat, global nature of Internet access, however, and the ease with which content hosting can be shifted from one jurisdiction to another, mean that effective prosecution and removal of illegal content can no longer be restricted to one territory. Thus, there is a growing trend for national governments to block access to Web sites (Deibert et al, 2008). ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

Already a subscriber? Login here.

Read an overview of all that is included in our subscription service.

We also offer site-wide subscriptions for organizations of all types. Get more information about our institutional service.

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish