About Get Newsletters Login
February 08, 2012
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

Under the Influence: Fighting the Afghanistan Strategy

By Andrew Bast | 07 Aug 2009
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish
If July represents the first results of the Afghanistan surge, the portrait is sobering. With 75 troops killed, it was the deadliest month for the coalition since the war began. The British, who have about 9,000 soldiers in the country, were hit particularly hard, with eight soldiers killed in less than 24 hours recently. The painful news sounded political echoes in London. The House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee announced last week that "avoidable mistakes" have been part of a deficient strategy, leading to mission creep. It singled out the U.K.'s anti-poppy campaign, in particular, as a "poisoned chalice." All of this is without mentioning the assessment by the U.N. that civilian casualties are 24 percent higher this year than last.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., as casualties mount, the military is considering an escalation. Citing several members of an advisory team tasked by new ISAF commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal to reconsider strategy, the Washington Post reported last Friday that more troops may well be needed to root out corruption, counter the Taliban, and beef up the Afghan national army. ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

Already a subscriber? Login here.

Read an overview of all that is included in our subscription service.

We also offer site-wide subscriptions for organizations of all types. Get more information about our institutional service.

Login to Discuss Email Email | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconRepublish